Comments on: Article of the Day: Consequentialism FAQ http://mtgap.wordpress.com/2012/10/03/article-of-the-day-consequentialism-faq/ Sometimes controversial, sometimes fallacious, sometimes thought-provoking, and always fun. Thu, 16 May 2013 04:35:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Michael Dickens http://mtgap.wordpress.com/2012/10/03/article-of-the-day-consequentialism-faq/#comment-2115 Thu, 25 Oct 2012 05:32:47 +0000 http://mtgap.wordpress.com/?p=1850#comment-2115 See: Why We Identify Good and Evil

http://mtgap.wordpress.com/2010/07/16/why-we-identify-good-and-evil/

]]> By: oneworldnet http://mtgap.wordpress.com/2012/10/03/article-of-the-day-consequentialism-faq/#comment-2112 Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:25:11 +0000 http://mtgap.wordpress.com/?p=1850#comment-2112 Apart from reading like a computer fantasy game, there’s no logic in this argument, since all conclusions are based on fantasy ‘facts’ and not real. If a person does something in a spirit of love, giving, tenderness, compassion and co-operation and as a result something bad happens to another which could not have been foreseen but which is the result of coincidence and natural forces, how could the person who committed that act be judged a morally wrong act? It makes no sense, and if posed in real circumstances and not a computer game, this is abundantly clear.

]]>